瑕疵證據的可采性及其證明力
摘 要
瑕疵證據，是指民事訴訟當事人在收集證據時用的手段或是證據本身的表現形式有缺陷，導致證明能力下降的證據。瑕疵證據在我國現階段是必然產生的。但我國現階段對瑕疵證據的規定較少，也并不規范。所以，應對瑕疵證據的可采性做出1個判斷的標準：看訴訟當事人違反法律的程度和侵害他人合法權益的大小；是否有其他證據的補強；衡量各方面的利益對其是否可以采用做出判斷。并且對1些嚴重違反法律規定的或嚴重侵害他人合法權益的瑕疵證據予以排除。而且，其證明力只有在有其他證據對其補強后才能對事實的真相做出證明。
關鍵詞：瑕疵證據；排除規則；證據能力；證明力
Abstract
Flaw evidence refers to the evidence which causes proving ability to decrease because of the defects of collecting evidence or the defects of its representation. It comes into being inevitably during this period of our country. But now there is less stipulate of flaw evidence and the stipulate existed now is not normal. Thus there should be a standard about the receivability of flaw evidence: the extent to which the lawsuit part has violated law and invaded others legal rights and interests; is there any other makeup or strengthening; consider the interests of all aspects to judge the adoptability of the flaw evidence. And exclude some flaw evidence whieh violated law and invade others legal rights and interests seriously. what is more，the ability of evidence could be useful for the truth only after other added evidences work at same time。
Key words: flaw evidence; excluding rule; the ability of evidence; proving ability.
..............................
注：【包括：畢業，任務書，開題報告】
【瑕疵證據的可采性及其證明力】相關文章：
淺論法律的變動性權威瑕疵及其矯正03-24
關于電子證據的證明力問題的研究03-26
論審計證據的證明標準12-04
芻議審計證據說服力03-24
企業核心競爭力的價值相關性及其信息表露03-21
殼公司的財務特征及其被并購的可猜測性分析03-22
簡論國際商事合同中的合意瑕疵及其法律救濟03-19
“可稅性”理論淺探03-21
文化力視角下的金融核心競爭力及其結構03-23